Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2019; 25(48): 6902-6915
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6902
Table 2 Relationship between cancer susceptibility candidate 9 and pathological data
FactorsPatient group (n = 80)TP value
Gender0.3080.759
Male (n = 50)3.287 ± 0.553
Female (n = 30)3.326 ± 0.553
Age (yr)07510.455
< 55 (n = 35)3.354 ± 0.504
≥ 55 (n = 45)3.261 ± 0.585
Tumor size4.357< 0.001
≥ 5 cm (n = 45)3.489 ± 0.414
< 5 cm (n = 35)3.06 ± 0.611
Combined hepatitis0.5750.567
Yes (n = 70)3.315 ± 0.540
No (n = 10)3.208 ± 0.634
TNM stage4.157< 0.001
Stage I+II (n = 33)3.496 ± 0.448
Stage III+IV (n = 47)3.024 ± 0.567
Lymph node metastasis4.557< 0.001
Yes (n = 42)3.54 ± 0.445
No (n = 38)3.038 ± 0.538
Differentiation4.387< 0.001
Low differentiation (n = 27)3.642 ± 0.405
Moderate + high differentiation (n = 53)3.128 ± 0.535
AFP (ng/mL)3.6170.001
≤ 200 (n = 25)3.609 ± 0.393
> 200 (n = 55)3.162 ± 0.557