Opinion Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2019; 25(48): 6880-6889
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6880
Table 3 Comparison of pediatric studies on gastric electrical stimulation
Ref.MethodSample SizeDurationFindings
Islam et al[28]Prospective study on children with chronic nausea and vomiting98-42 mo7 of the 9 patients reporting sustained improvement in symptoms and improved quality of life
Islam et al[5]Retrospective review in children less than 18 years with diagnosis of gastroparesis9710 yrA significant reduction in all individual symptoms as well as the total symptom score at 1, 6, 12, and 12 mo. Recurrence of symptoms leading to device removal occurred in 7 cases. Forty-one patients had continued improvement in symptoms for over 12 mo, with a mean follow up of 3.5 years
Lu et al[29]Retrospective review on patients with functional dyspepsia246-8 moSignificant improvements were seen in multiple areas of the PedsQL, including stomach pain/upset, food/drink limits, heartburn/reflux, gas/bloating, patient worry, medication tolerance, and constipation
Teich et al[35]Prospective study on children with chronic nausea and vomiting refractory to medical therapy and met ROME III criteria for functional dyspepsia160.5-23 moSignificant improvement in severity and frequency of vomiting, frequency and severity of nausea. Also showed decrease in dependence on enteral/parenteral nutrition
Elfvin et al[36]Retrospective review on children with nausea and vomiting312-40 dFavorable response to temporary percutaneous gastric electrical stimulation with greater than 50% vomiting reduction
Hyman et al[26]Case report on a 7 years old boy with intractable visceral pain and gastroparesis and failure to thrive137 moReduction in pain, retching and vomiting. Successful initiation of enteral feeds and meeting caloric requirements