Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2019; 25(46): 6743-6751
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6743
Published online Dec 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6743
Tailored therapy using DPO-PCR (n = 50) | Empirical bismuth-based quadruple therapy (n = 104) | P value | |
Eradication-related side effects | < 0.001 | ||
No | 44 (88.0) | 59 (56.7) | |
Yes | 6 (12.0) | 45 (43.7) | |
Abdominal discomfort | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | |
Nausea/vomiting | 3 (6.0) | 12 (11.5) | |
Diarrhea/loose stool | 0 (0.0) | 12 (11.5) | |
Dyspepsia | 2 (4.0) | 10 (9.6) | |
General weakness | 1 (2.0) | 6 (5.8) | |
Taste disturbance | 0 (0.0) | 4 (3.8) | |
Treatment compliances | |||
50 (100.0) | 100 (96.2) | 0.2 |
- Citation: Choi YI, Chung JW, Park DK, Kim KO, Kwon KA, Kim YJ, Seo JY. Tailored eradication vs empirical bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A comparative, open trial. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(46): 6743-6751
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i46/6743.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i46.6743