Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2019; 25(40): 6053-6062
Published online Oct 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053
Table 1 Quantitative ultrasound: Optimal cutoffs obtained using proton density fat fraction with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard
TechniqueS0 vs S1–S3S0–S1 vs S2–S3S0–S2 vs S3
BSC[20], 1/cm-sr (NAFLD)0.0038------------------
Sensitivity: 93%------------------
Specificity: 97%------------------
CAP[30], dB/m (NAFLD)288------------------
Sensitivity: 75%
Specificity: 77%
ATI[40], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD)0.630.72---------
Sensitivity: 80%Sensitivity: 100%---------
Specificity: 89%Specificity: 78%---------
UGAP[43], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD)0.630.680.74
Sensitivity: 80%Sensitivity: 83%Sensitivity: 87%
Specificity: 91%Specificity: 74%Specificity: 79%
SSE[46], mm/μs (not specified)1.5371.511---------
Sensitivity: 80%Sensitivity: 100%---------
Specificity: 86%Specificity: 96%---------