Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2019; 25(40): 6053-6062
Published online Oct 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053
Published online Oct 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053
Technique | S0 vs S1–S3 | S0–S1 vs S2–S3 | S0–S2 vs S3 |
BSC[20], 1/cm-sr (NAFLD) | 0.0038 | --------- | --------- |
Sensitivity: 93% | --------- | --------- | |
Specificity: 97% | --------- | --------- | |
CAP[30], dB/m (NAFLD) | 288 | --------- | --------- |
Sensitivity: 75% | |||
Specificity: 77% | |||
ATI[40], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD) | 0.63 | 0.72 | --------- |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 100% | --------- | |
Specificity: 89% | Specificity: 78% | --------- | |
UGAP[43], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD) | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 83% | Sensitivity: 87% | |
Specificity: 91% | Specificity: 74% | Specificity: 79% | |
SSE[46], mm/μs (not specified) | 1.537 | 1.511 | --------- |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 100% | --------- | |
Specificity: 86% | Specificity: 96% | --------- |
- Citation: Ferraioli G, Soares Monteiro LB. Ultrasound-based techniques for the diagnosis of liver steatosis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(40): 6053-6062
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i40/6053.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053