Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2019; 25(4): 485-497
Published online Jan 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.485
Table 4 Risk factors for common bile duct stone recurrence
VariableRecurrence, n (%)
P-valueMultivariate analysis
No (n = 241)Yes (n = 61)OR (95%CI)P-value
Age, mean ± SD, yr57.2 ± 14.357.3 ± 14.10.974--
Sex (female)131 (54.4)33 (54.1)0.971--
Intervention method0.1560.841
OCT102 (42.3)32 (52.5)Reference
EST139 (57.7)29 (47.5)0.93 (0.47-1.86)
Bile duct diameter, cm< 0.001b0.011b
< 15180 (74.7)25 (41.0)Reference
≥ 1561 (25.3)36 (59.0)2.72 (1.26-5.87)
Distal CBD angle ≤ 145°78 (32.4)37 (60.6)< 0.001b2.92 (1.54-5.55)0.001b
Stone number< 0.001b< 0.001b
Single167 (69.3)15 (24.6)Reference
Multiple74 (30.7)46 (75.4)5.09 (2.58-10.07)
Maximum stone size, mm0.002b0.904
< 20216 (89.6)45 (73.8)Reference
≥ 2025 (10.4)16 (26.2)1.06 (0.43-2.63)
Mechanical lithotripsy9 (3.7)3 (4.9)0.673--
Bacterial cholangitis63 (26.1)13 (21.3)0.438--
Previous gastrectomy
Billroth-I6 (2.5)1 (1.6)0.696--
Billroth-II6 (2.5)3 (4.9)0.328--
Hypertension26 (10.8)8 (13.1)0.608--
Diabetes mellitus17 (7.1)1 (1.6)0.1450.29 (0.03-2.51)0.261
Charlson comorbidity index, mean ± SD0.7 ± 0.90.6 ± 0.90.499--