Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2019; 25(37): 5687-5701
Published online Oct 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5687
Published online Oct 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5687
Downstaging and bridging protocol | |
Inclusion Criteria | |
Bridging | |
Patients who were within MC or UNOS T2 | |
Downstaging subgroups (HCC exceeding MC) | |
Group 1 = 1 lesion > 5 and ≤ 8 cm | |
Group 2 = 2 or 3 lesions at least one > 3 and ≤ 5 cm with the sum of the maximal tumor diameters ≤ 8 cm | |
Group 3 = 4 or 5 lesions each ≤ 3 cm with the sum of the maximal tumor diameters ≤ 8 cm | |
Group 4 = 2 or 3 lesions at least one > 5cm with the sum of the maximal tumor diameters ≤ 8 cm | |
Group 5 = total tumor diameter > 8 cm | |
Absence of vascular invasion based on cross-sectional MRI or CT | |
Criteria for successful downstaging | |
Residual tumor(s) within MC for deceased donor liver transplant | |
In patients with 4 or 5 tumors, successful downstaging requires complete necrosis (based on cross-sectional MRI or CT) of at least 1 to 2 tumor(s), respectively, so that there will be no more than 3 lesions with viable tumor each ≤ 3 cm to meet MC | |
Criteria for downstaging failure and exclusion from liver transplant | |
Progression of tumor(s) to beyond inclusion criteria for downstaging and bridging based on tumor size and number | |
Vascular invasion based on cross-sectional MRI or CT | |
Lymph node involvement by tumor or extra-hepatic spread of tumor |
- Citation: Affonso BB, Galastri FL, da Motta Leal Filho JM, Nasser F, Falsarella PM, Cavalcante RN, de Almeida MD, Felga GEG, Valle LGM, Wolosker N. Long-term outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma that underwent chemoembolization for bridging or downstaging. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(37): 5687-5701
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i37/5687.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5687