Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2019; 25(37): 5641-5654
Published online Oct 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5641
Table 3 Noncompliance rate of nodal dissection between robotic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy
VariableRSPSHL
LSPSHL
P-value
CompliantNoncompliantCompliantNoncompli-ant
cT classification
cT2376160.791
cT36931390.761
cT44619290.741
cN classification
cN04922360.868
cN16815230.825
cN22211100.647
cN3138150.848
cTNM stage
I11581.000
II91618310.950
III3533450.909
BMI, kg/m2
< 25111438680.449
≥ 252818160.139
Total132256840.757

  • Citation: Wang JB, Liu ZY, Chen QY, Zhong Q, Xie JW, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Que SJ, Zheng CH, Huang CM, Li P. Short-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy via Huang's three-step maneuver for advanced upper gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score-matched study. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(37): 5641-5654
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i37/5641.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5641