Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2019; 25(37): 5619-5629
Published online Oct 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5619
Published online Oct 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5619
Overall diagnosis | Definite diagnosis | Possible diagnosis | ||||
Point estimate (%) | 95%CI (%) | Point estimate (%) | 95%CI (%) | Point estimate (%) | 95%CI (%) | |
Sensitivity | 99.95 | 99.94-99.95 | 99.89 | 99.88-99.90 | 99.89 | 99.88-99.90 |
Specificity | 98.72 | 98.70-98.73 | 99.68 | 99.67-99.68 | 99.03 | 99.02-99.05 |
Positive predictive value | 98.70 | 98.68-98.72 | 99.34 | 99.32-99.36 | 98.08 | 98.05-98.11 |
Negative predictive value | 99.95 | 99.94-99.95 | 99.95 | 99.94-99.95 | 99.95 | 99.94-99.95 |
- Citation: Hwang YJ, Park SM, Ahn S, Lee JC, Park YS, Kim N. Accuracy of an administrative database for pancreatic cancer by international classification of disease 10th codes: A retrospective large-cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(37): 5619-5629
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i37/5619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5619