Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2019; 25(36): 5403-5422
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5403
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5403
Table 1 Evidence level and recommendation strength
Level | Detailed description |
Evidence Level | |
A | High quality: Further research cannot change the reliability of these treatment assessment results. |
B | Moderate quality: Further research may influence the reliability of these treatment assessment results, and may change the treatment assessment results. |
C | Low or very low quality: Further research will very likely influence the reliability of these treatment assessment results, and will very likely change the treatment assessment results. |
Recommendation strength | |
1 | Strong recommendation: It is clearly shown that either the benefits of intervention clearly outweigh the disadvantages, or that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. |
2 | Weak recommendation: The benefits and disadvantages are unclear, or, regardless of the quality of the evidence, the benefits and disadvantages are comparable. |
- Citation: Xu XY, Ding HG, Li WG, Jia JD, Wei L, Duan ZP, Liu YL, Ling-Hu EQ, Zhuang H, Hepatology CSO, Association CM. Chinese guidelines on management of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(36): 5403-5422
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i36/5403.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5403