Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2019; 25(33): 4985-4998
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4985
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4985
Table 7 Treatment responses during nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with pre-existing rtM204I variants
Outcome | Tenofovir (n = 7) | Entecavir (n = 6) | Low genetic barriers1 (n = 4) | P value |
Reduction of HBV-DNA (log10 IU/mL), mean ± SD | ||||
Mo 3 | -3.22 ± 0.74 | -2.12 ± 0.532 | -2.22 ± 0.402 | 0.011 |
Mo 6 | -3.97 ± 0.75 | -2.71 ± 0.432 | -2.92 ± 0.512 | 0.005 |
Mo 9 | -4.44 ± 0.70 | -3.33 ± 0.482 | -3.28 ± 0.352 | 0.004 |
Mo 12 | -4.75 ± 0.59 | -3.65 ± 0.432 | -3.52 ± 0.602 | 0.003 |
Complete virologic response, cumulative incidence | ||||
Mo 12 | 100% | 16.7%2 | 25%2 | 0.021 |
- Citation: Choe WH, Kim K, Lee SY, Choi YM, Kwon SY, Kim JH, Kim BJ. Tenofovir is a more suitable treatment than entecavir for chronic hepatitis B patients carrying naturally occurring rtM204I mutations. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(33): 4985-4998
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i33/4985.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4985