Liver cirrhosis and left ventricle diastolic dysfunction: Systematic review

Table 4 Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction and its’ grades in analysed studies

Author	Diagnosis of LVDD in patients, n (%)	Grade 1, n	Grade 2, n	Grade 3, n	Diagnosis of LVDD in controls, n (%)	Year of LVDD guidelines used
Dadhich et al[31]	28 (70)	11	17			2009
Lee et al[32]	44 (62.8)	34	10			2009
Karagiannakis et al[33]	17 (37.7)	9	8			2009
Alexopoulou et al[34]	51 (67.1)	37	11	3		2009
Farouk et al[15]	9 (25.7)	9				2009
Bhuin et al[16]	57 (81.4)	29	28			2009
Cesari et al[35]	43 (37)	4	28	11	7 (16)	2009
Ru ız-del- Arbol, et al[21]	37 (46.2)	19	18			2009
Rimbas et al[36]	22 (47.8)	12	8	2		2016
Hammami et al[25]	41 (51.2)	19	11	11	8 (10)	2016
Merli et al[37]	36 (40)	24	12			2009
Merli et al[26]	47 (63.5)	37	10			2009
Kazankov et al[38]	24 (54.5)	11	12	1		2009
Nazar et al[22]	58 (58)	42	16			2009
Devauchelle et al[39]	14 (35)	11	3			2009
Somani et al[24]	18 (30)	15	3			2009
Total	546 (51.2)	323	195	28	15 (4.7)

LVDD: Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction.