Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2019; 25(31): 4534-4554
Published online Aug 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4534
Published online Aug 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4534
Ref. | Study design | Sample size | Treatment evaluated | Prior biologic exposure | Interval between the CE | CE findings considered for assessing mucosal healing | Positive SB findings before treatment | Positive SB findings after treatment | P-value |
Efthymiou et al[85], 2008 | Prospective, blinded | 40 | CS (60%) Mesalamine (70%) Azathioprine (10%) Infliximab (5%) Metronidazo-le (20%) | - | After achievement of clinical remission: 4 wk (75%) | Number of apthous ulcers, mean ± SE | 26.0 ± 7.5 | 12.7 ± 2.3 | 0.07 |
6 wk (15%) | Number of large ulcers, mean ± SE | 8.3 ± 1.4 | 5.0 ± 0.8 | 0.01 | |||||
8 wk (10%) | Percentage of the SBTT in which any endoscopic lesion was visible, mean ± SE | 22.0 ± 3.1 | 17.8 ± 2.5 | 0.08 | |||||
Tsibouris et al[86], 2013 | Prospective, blinded | 1021 | - | - | ≥ 15 d after CDAI dropped < 150: 2-3 mo; (26.5%) 3-6 mo; (19.6%) 6-12 mo; (53.9%) | CECDAI score, mean ± SD | 14 ± 6 | 4 ± 2 | - |
Niv et al[44], 2014 | Prospective, blinded | 19 | Copaxone (68.4%) 5-ASA (52.6%) Antibiotics (15.8%) CS (5.3%) IS (10.5%) Vitamins (26.3%) Others (36.8%) | - | 12 wk | Lewis score, mean ± SD | 1730 ± 1780 | No correlation between changes in CDAI/IBDQ and Lewis score2 | - |
Hall et al[42], 2014 | Prospective, blinded | 43 | Adalimumab (84%) 160 mg W0, 80 mg W2, then 40 mg /2 wk or Azathioprine (16%) 2-2.5 mg/kg | Naïve 38/43 Exposed 5/43 | 52 wk3 | Complete MH = Absence of ulcers, n (%) Normalizatio-n of CECDAI score < 3.5, n (%) Change in CECDAI score, n (%) | - - CECDAI < 3.5: 4/43 (9%) 3.5 ≤ CECDAI < 5.8: 13/43 (30%) CECDAI ≥ 5.8: 26/43 (61%) | Complete MH: 12/28 (43%) CECDAI < 3.5: 2/28 (7%) CECDAI ≤ 3.5 < 5.8: 6/28 (21%) CECDAI ≥ 5.8: 8/28 (29%) | < 0.0001 |
Kopylov et al[45], 2015 | Prospective | 52 | None (15.4%) 5-ASA (9.6%) Thiopurine (36.6%) Anti-TNF (26.9%) Anti-TNF+IS (11.5%) | - | NA Included patients were all in clinical remission (CDAI < 150) and had only one CE. | MH = Lewis score < 135 | NA | MH: 8/52 (15.4%) 135 ≤ Lewis < 790: 33/52 (63.5%) Lewis score ≥ 790: 11/52 (21.2%) | - |
Shafran et al[43], 2016 | Prospective, open-label | 15 | Certolizumab pegol 400 mg W0, W2, W4 then /4 wk | Naïve 3/15 Exposed 12/154 | 24 wk in responders | Lewis score, mean | 1663 | 226 | - |
Aggarwal et al[46], 2017 | Prospective, blinded | 43 | None (14%) 5-ASA (60%) CS (12%) IS (74%) Anti-TNF (21%) | - | NA Included patients were all in clinical remission (CDAI < 150) and had only one CE. | MH = Lewis score < 135 | NA | MH: 17/43 (40%) 135 ≤ Lewis < 790: 19/43 (44%) Lewis score ≥ 790: 7/43 (16%) Significant correlation between Lewis score and fecal calprotectin (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001) | - |
Mitselos et al[47], 2018 | Retrospective | 30 | None (37%) 5-ASA (17%) Budesonide (10%) Azathioprine (10%) Anti-TNF (20%) Anti-TNF+IS (6%) | - | NA Included patients had only one CE (60% in both clinical and biochemical remission) | MH = Lewis score < 1355 | NA | MH: 6/15 (40%) Weak correlation between CDAI and Lewis score (r = 0.32, P = 0.088) and between CRP and Lewis score (r = 0.52, P = 0.004) | - |
Nakamura et al[87], 2018 | Prospective, blinded | 92 | None (27%) 5-ASA (18%) Thiopurines (17%) Infliximab (20%); Adalimumab (10%) Elemental diet (5%) CS (3%) | Naïve 38/92Exposed 54/92 | 6 mo in the active group (40/92) Non-active patients ended the study at baseline (52/92) | Lewis score, mean MH = Lewis score of 0 Active CD: Lewis score > 135 | 458 | 233 MH: 2/296 Improvement of LS in all 7 patients who received biologics, and in 8/11 (73%) of asymptomatic patients receiving additional medication | 0.0004 |
- Citation: Le Berre C, Trang-Poisson C, Bourreille A. Small bowel capsule endoscopy and treat-to-target in Crohn's disease: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(31): 4534-4554
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i31/4534.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4534