Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2019; 25(31): 4512-4533
Published online Aug 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4512
Published online Aug 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4512
Quality variable | Quality variable categories | Number of studies | Proportion (column %) |
Representativeness of sampling procedures used in each study | Non-probability | 12 | 100.0 |
Probability | 0 | ||
Response rate | Above 80% | 10 | 83.3 |
Between 60% and 80% | 2 | ||
Not reported | 0 | ||
Validity of measurement methods for risk factors | Face to face interview | 12 | 100.0 |
Self-administered questionnaire | |||
Bias in the measurement of the esophageal cancer | Histology | 10 | 83.3 |
Endoscopy | 1 | ||
Not reported | 1 | ||
Control for important confounders | Yes | 11 | 91.7 |
Not reported | 1 | ||
Final score (mean across the items) | 91.7 |
- Citation: Asombang AW, Chishinga N, Nkhoma A, Chipaila J, Nsokolo B, Manda-Mapalo M, Montiero JFG, Banda L, Dua KS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of esophageal cancer in Africa: Epidemiology, risk factors, management and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(31): 4512-4533
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i31/4512.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4512