Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2019; 25(28): 3823-3837
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3823
Table 6 Nutrition screening tools correlating with nutrition assessment tools
NSTComparative NAT measureStatistical VariableValueStudy ID
MUSTFFMICohen’s Kappa (low/normal FFMI vs low MUST)κ = 0.53 (95%CI: 0.39-0.67)Csontos et al[30]
SMILogistic Regression (MUST 0,1 vs ≥ 2)OR: 0.934, P = 0.014aBamba et al[9]
RD/GI AssessmentCohen’s Kappaκ = 0.15Haskey et al[35]
MIRTSGASpearman’s Rank Correlationρ = 0.394, P = 0.005aJansen et al[8]
NRS-2002SMILogistic Regression (NRS-2002 1, 2 vs ≥ 3)OR: 0.928, P = 0.008aBamba et al[9]
SaskIBD-NRRD/GI AssessmentCohen’s Kappaκ = 0.73Haskey et al[35]