Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2019; 25(28): 3808-3822
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3808
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3808
All patients CD and IC n = 27 | CD n = 20 | |
Age at diagnosis year | 13.46 (2.40) | 13.48 (2.02) |
Male % | 74% | 75% |
Medications ratio (%) | ||
Biological alone or combination therapy | 12/27 (44.4%) | 11/20 (55%) |
Immune modulators with no biologic combination | 8/27 (30%) | 5/20 (25%) |
5 ASA +- steroids | 4/27 (15%) | 3/20 (15%) |
Steroids alone | 2/27 (7%) | 0/20 (0%) |
Antibiotic alone | 1/27 (4%) | 1/20 (5%) |
Phenotype% | ||
Inflammatory | 93% | 93% |
Stricturing | 7% | 7% |
Duration of disease year | 1.7 (2.32) | 2.1 (2.57) |
BMI percentile | 57 (32.9) | 58.18 (35.83) |
PCDAI | 10.2 (12.5) | 9.8 (11.6) |
SB transit time min | 233 (115.4) | 241(184.99) |
Days between MRE and WCE days | 4.19 (1.88) | 4 (1.90) |
- Citation: Hijaz NM, Attard TM, Colombo JM, Mardis NJ, Friesen CA. Comparison of the use of wireless capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance enterography in children with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(28): 3808-3822
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i28/3808.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3808