Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2019; 25(28): 3704-3721
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3704
Table 2 Selected studies on the use of adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy
Ref.Study typeArms and interventionNumber of patientsMain outcomesComments
Peng et al (2009)[169]Retrospective cohortLR vs LR+TACE53 control vs 51 treatment (TACE)Improved 1-, 3- and 5-yr survival with TACEHCC< 3 cm + portal vein thrombosis
Liu et al (2016)[118]Retrospective cohortLR vs LR+TACE55 Control vs 62 TreatmentOverall: Improved 1-year OS with TACE, but no difference in 2- and 3-yr DFS rates.For tumor size > 5 cm: improve 1-, 2- and 3-yr DFS. For tumor size ≤ 5 cm: no difference in 1-, 2- and 3-yr DFS
Li et al (2017)[117]Retrospective cohortLR vs LR+TACE459 control vs 295 treatmentLR + TACE improved postoperative recurrence and long-term survival.Patients with HCC beyond Milan Criteria.
Ye et al (2017)[170]Retrospective cohortLR vs LR+TACE260 microvascular invasion (86 in LR +TACE) resection; 259 w/o microvascular invasion (72 in LR+TACE) armLR + TACE improved OS and DFS in patients with microvascular invasion but not in patients without microvascular invasion.All patients had BCLC Stage A or B
Qi et al (2018)[171]Retrospective cohortLR vs LR+TACE200 patients with microvascular invasion (91 LR +TACE vs 109 LR only)Similar 1-, 2- and 3-yr DFS between groups. Subgroup with tumor size > 5 cm had better DFS and OS with LR+TACE.All patients had microvascular invasion and were BCLC A or B stage.
Liao et al (2017)[123]Meta-analysisLR vs LR+TACE8 RCTs and 12 retrospective studies, totaling 3191 patients (1193 treatment vs 1952 control).Significantly higher RFS and OS benefit with postoperative adjuvant TACE compared to surgery aloneGood consistency in findings between RCTs and non-RCTs, however, chemotherapy regimens differed between centers/trials.