Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2019; 25(28): 3704-3721
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3704
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3704
Ref. | Study type | Arms and Intervention | Number of patients | Main outcomes | Comments |
Outcomes of adjuvant interferon-based therapy for HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. | |||||
Ikeda et al (2000)[167] | RCT | 36 mo of Interferon (IFN) with 2-yr follow-up | 20 (8 per arm) | IFN treatment decreased tumor recurrence. | Included 4 patients treated with PEI. |
Kubo et al (2001,[75] 2002,[77] 2005[76]) | RCT | 88 weeks of IFN versus no therapy. Median follow up of 1087 days. | 30 (15 per arm) | IFN decreased the recurrence and survival after resection | All male patients with high viral loads. |
Hsu et al (2013)[78] | Retrospective Cohort | PEG-IFN + Ribavirin for > 16 weeks versus no therapy. | 1065 (213 treatment and 852 controls) | PEG-IFN + Ribavirin associated with decrease 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐yr recurrence rate of HCC and 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐yr mortality. | The NNT for one fewer recurrent HCC at 5 yr = 8. Risk attenuation higher in younger patients. |
Lee et al (2013)[79] | Prospective Cohort | PEG-IFN for 12 mo versus no therapy. Median follow up of 24 mo. | 93 (31 treatment and 62 controls) | PEG-IFN associated with decrease 1‐and 2‐year recurrence and higher 1‐ and 2‐year survival. | All patients had MTA1‐positive HCC and high viral levels. |
Wu et al (2018)[80] | Meta-analysis | PEG-IFN versus no therapy | 4 cohort studies, 1280 patients. 3 studies had 5-year survival data with 276 PEG-IFN and 911 control total. | PEG-IFN improved the 3- and 5-yr RFS and 5-yr OS. | Included data from Hsu et al, and Lee et al |
Outcomes of nucleoside analog treatment for HBV related HCC | |||||
Wu et al (2012)[90] | Retrospective Cohort | Nucleoside analog for at least 90 days vs no therapy | 4569 (518 treated and 4051 controls) | Nucleoside analog treatment was associated with a lower risk of HCC recurrence. | Nucleoside analogues included lamivudine, entecavir, and telbivudine |
Yang et al (2012)[91] | Prospective Cohort | Antiviral therapy vs no treatment. | 330 patients (142 treated vs 188 untreated). All high viral loads. | Antiviral therapy was associated with RFS and OS. High associated with poor OS and RFS | High viral load (≥ 10000 copies/mL) and low viral load (< 10000 copies/mL). Antiviral included lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, or entecavir. |
Yin et al (2013)[88] | Two-stage longitudinal clinical study (RCT and non-RCT) | Nucleoside analog (NA) vs no therapy. | 617 in non-RCT (215 treatment and 402 controls) | NA treatment improved postop liver function, decreased HCC recurrence, and improved postoperative survival | Lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, or entecavir. |
163 in RCT (81 treatment and 82 controls) | |||||
Chong et al (2015)[168] | Retrospective cohort | Antiviral therapy vs no therapy | 404 (254 antiviral and 150 controls) | Antiviral therapy improves long‐term survival post‐hepatectomy. No difference in early or late recurrence. | |
Zhang et al (2015)[74] | Retrospective cohort | Entecavir antiviral therapy vs no therapy | 112 (72 antiviral and 40 controls) | Antiviral treatment improves morbidity and improved postoperative liver function. | Patients with preop HBV DNA > 104 copies/mL received antiviral therapy as well. |
Huang et al (2015)[72] | RCT | adefovir antiviral therapy vs no therapy | 200 (100 antiviral and 100 controls) | adefovir antiviral therapy reduced late HCC recurrence and improved OS | Patients had high preoperative HBV DNA (> 2000 IU/mL) |
Huang et al (2018)[92] | RCT | Telbivudine antiviral therapy vs no therapy | 200 (100 antiviral and 100 controls) | Telbivudine HCC resulted in better 5-year OS and RFS, as well as a lower rate of HBV reactivation | Patient with low (< 2000 IU/mL) HBV DNA titer. |
- Citation: Akateh C, Black SM, Conteh L, Miller ED, Noonan A, Elliott E, Pawlik TM, Tsung A, Cloyd JM. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(28): 3704-3721
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i28/3704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3704