Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2019; 25(26): 3313-3333
Published online Jul 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3313
Table 1 Success rates of conventional duodenoscope and forward-view endoscope in Billroth II operation
Ref.Endoscope typeOperation typeSuccess rate of afferent loop intubation, %Success rate of cannulation, %Complication rate, %
Jang et al[44]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II1001000
Bove et al[9]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II86.793.82.7
Cicek et al[11]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II86.488.210.2
Wu et al[13]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II90.588.612.5
Kim and Kim[67]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II1001004
Park et al[68]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II86.892.33.6
Wang et al[8]Conventional side-view duodenoscopeBillroth II62.510010.3
Forward-view gastroscope Standard colonoscopeBillroth II84.681.8
Billroth II93.591.2
Cap-fitted forward-view gastroscope/ without capBillroth II92.5/88.691.13
Park et al[38]Cap-fitted forward-view gastroscopeBillroth II10010010
Lin et al[69]Forward-view gastroscope
Billroth II76.881.40