Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3091-3107
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091
Table 3 Results of the systematic review
No. (%)
Study design, n (%)
Retrospective cohort36/43 (83.7)
Retrospective comparative4/43 (9.3)
Prospective comparative2/43 (4.7)
Prospective cohort1/43 (2.3)
Total number of identified patients2669
1Type of endoscope, n (%)
Side-viewing endoscope1432/2575 (55.6)
Forward-viewing endoscope664/2575 (25.8)
Balloon-assisted enteroscope197/2575 (7.7)
Anterior oblique-viewing endoscope169/2575 (6.6)
Dual-lumen endoscope64/2575 (2.5)
Colonoscope31/2575 (1.2)
Multiple bending endoscope14/2575 (0.5)
Others4/2575 (0.2)
Overall success of afferent loop intubation, n (%)2437/2669 (91.3)
Overall success of selective cannulation, n (%)2346/2437 (87.9)
Overall adverse events, n (%)195 (7.3)
Bowel perforation74 (2.8)
Post-ERCP pancreatitis65 (2.4)
Bleeding37 (1.4)
Mortality9 (0.3)
2Others10 (0.4)