Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3091-3107
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091
No. (%) | |
Study design, n (%) | |
Retrospective cohort | 36/43 (83.7) |
Retrospective comparative | 4/43 (9.3) |
Prospective comparative | 2/43 (4.7) |
Prospective cohort | 1/43 (2.3) |
Total number of identified patients | 2669 |
1Type of endoscope, n (%) | |
Side-viewing endoscope | 1432/2575 (55.6) |
Forward-viewing endoscope | 664/2575 (25.8) |
Balloon-assisted enteroscope | 197/2575 (7.7) |
Anterior oblique-viewing endoscope | 169/2575 (6.6) |
Dual-lumen endoscope | 64/2575 (2.5) |
Colonoscope | 31/2575 (1.2) |
Multiple bending endoscope | 14/2575 (0.5) |
Others | 4/2575 (0.2) |
Overall success of afferent loop intubation, n (%) | 2437/2669 (91.3) |
Overall success of selective cannulation, n (%) | 2346/2437 (87.9) |
Overall adverse events, n (%) | 195 (7.3) |
Bowel perforation | 74 (2.8) |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 65 (2.4) |
Bleeding | 37 (1.4) |
Mortality | 9 (0.3) |
2Others | 10 (0.4) |
- Citation: Park TY, Song TJ. Recent advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Billroth II gastrectomy patients: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(24): 3091-3107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i24/3091.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091