Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3079-3090
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3079
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3079
Table 3 Logistic regression results for clinical resolution and rapid clinical resolution on global improvement score
Resolution (area under the curve; AUC = 0.72) | Rapid (vs slow) resolution (AUC = 0.63) | |||
Variable | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value |
Age at IE | 0.81 (0.73, 0.90) | < 0.001a | 0.95 (0.85, 1.06) | 0.365 |
Pain hx (in yr) | 1.00 (0.92, 1.08) | 0.949 | ||
Eosinophilia | 0.84 (0.45, 1.58) | 0.593 | ||
ActEng T-score | 1.11 (0.83, 1.48) | 0.479 | ||
PainWill T-score | 0.62 (0.46, 0.82) | 0.001a | 1.06 (0.74, 1.52) | 0.742 |
RfR | 0.85 (0.62, 1.15) | 0.288 | ||
AttnPriv | 1.02 (0.77, 1.37) | 0.865 | ||
School (not in school vs full-time) | 1.72 (0.70, 4.45) | 0.183 | ||
School (modified schedule vs full-time) | 0.81 (0.40, 1.66) | 0.243 | ||
Anxiety | 1.08 (0.76, 1.54) | 0.667 | ||
Depression | 1.25 (0.82, 1.93) | 0.301 | ||
Atypicality | 1.02 (0.72, 1.43) | 0.92 | ||
Anxiety_A | 1.15 (0.76, 1.75) | 0.502 | ||
Depression_A | 0.98 (0.64, 1.49) | 0.915 | ||
Atypicality_A | 1.10 (0.79, 1.56) | 0.588 | ||
SDSCTot | 0.72 (0.53, 0.98) | 0.040a | 0.53 (0.35, 0.78) | 0.002a |
Social Stress | 0.66 (0.42, 1.02) | 0.064 | 1.23 (0.86, 1.76) | 0.267 |
Relax_Parent | 1.46 (0.81, 2.61) | 0.206 | ||
Upset_Parent | 0.91 (0.48, 1.75) | 0.782 | ||
Relax_Patient | 0.99 (0.55, 1.75) | 0.961 | ||
Upset_Patient | 1.22 (0.66, 2.27) | 0.528 | ||
Biofeedback reported at 1st follow up | 1.26 (0.76, 2.09) | 0.362 |
- Citation: Deacy AD, Friesen CA, Staggs VS, Schurman JV. Evaluation of clinical outcomes in an interdisciplinary abdominal pain clinic: A retrospective, exploratory review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(24): 3079-3090
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i24/3079.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3079