Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3021-3029
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3021
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3021
Year | Patients | Biomarker candidate | Prediction of treatment outcome | |
Hayano et al[14] | 2007 | 31 | Baseline BF (CT perfusion) | High baseline BF associated with good response and OS after CRT (31) |
Makari et al[15] | 2007 | 46 | Baseline BF (CT perfusion) | High baseline BF associated with good response and OS after chemotherapy (36) and CRT (10) |
Djuric-Stefanovic et al[17] | 2015 | 40 | Post-therapeutic BF (CT perfusion) | Post-therapeutic BF < 30 mL/min/100 g can predict pCR with 100% of sensitivity and specificity |
Lei et al[13] | 2015 | 25 | Baseline Ktrans (MR perfusion) | Ktrans was significantly different between CR and non-CR after CRT |
Sun et al[12] | 2018 | 59 | Change of Ktrans (MR perfusion) | Change in Ktrans was the best parameter to assess treatment response |
- Citation: Hayano K, Ohira G, Hirata A, Aoyagi T, Imanishi S, Tochigi T, Hanaoka T, Shuto K, Matsubara H. Imaging biomarkers for the treatment of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(24): 3021-3029
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i24/3021.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3021