Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2019; 25(22): 2734-2742
Published online Jun 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2734
Table 4 Benefits and drawbacks of molecular analysis of cyst fluid and confocal endomicroscopy[11,12,15,29,34]
Molecular analysis of PCL fluidEUS-nCLE of PCLs
(DNA analysis)
High sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLsHigh sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mucinous PCLs
Markers can detect advanced neoplasia in IPMNs; need validation in multicenter studiesNeed further studies to address role of EUS-nCLE in the identification of advanced neoplasia in PCLs
Lower sensitivity for the detection of KRAS mutations in MCNsDetection of flat epithelium in MCNs can be difficult for early adapters of EUS-nCLE
Need large multicenter prospective studies with confirmed histopathology to replicate single center resultsNeed large multicenter prospective studies with confirmed histopathology to replicate single center results
Lack of established markers for cystic-NET and squamous lined cystsEUS-nCLE reveals specific image patterns for different PCL types. Unable to differentiate between cystic-NET and SPN
During EUS-FNA, 5%-10% of PCLs may not yield DNA for molecular analysisThere is a 2%-5% risk of technical and procedural issues with failure of image acquisition during EUS-nCLE
Low sensitivity for the detection of VHL mutations in SCAsEUS-nCLE identifies characteristic ‘fern-pattern’ of vascularity for diagnosing SCAs