Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2019; 25(21): 2650-2664
Published online Jun 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2650
Published online Jun 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2650
Study group (n = 189) | Validation group (n = 109) | All (n = 298) | ||||
Risk score | Risk score | Risk score | ||||
POPF grade | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High |
No POPF | 97 | 20 | 60 | 8 | 157 | 28 |
Grade A (BL) | 18 | 16 | 11 | 7 | 29 | 23 |
Grade B | 7 | 25 | 5 | 15 | 12 | 40 |
Grade C | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
CR-POPF rate | 5.7% | 46.3% | 6.6% | 54.6% | 6.1% | 49.0% |
r = 0.542 | r = 0.586 | r = 0.557 | ||||
P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 |
- Citation: Li Y, Zhou F, Zhu DM, Zhang ZX, Yang J, Yao J, Wei YJ, Xu YL, Li DC, Zhou J. Novel risk scoring system for prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(21): 2650-2664
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i21/2650.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2650