Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2019; 25(21): 2636-2649
Published online Jun 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2636
Table 3 The odds ratios for imaging features favoring a diagnosis of pathologic stage T2 over pT1
FeaturesCrude OR95%CIP value
T2 hyperintensity1.904(0.376-9.639)0.436
T1 hypointensity0.761(0.201-2.874)0.687
Arterial enhancement2.714(0.306-24.085)0.370
Corona enhancement2.671(1.101-6.480)0.030
Washout appearance1.043(0.246-4.419)0.954
Capsular appearance0.545(0.246-1.208)0.135
Hypointensity of tumor in the HB phase0.250(0.022-2.847)0.264
Peritumoral hypointensity in HB phase2.203(0.961-5.049)0.062
Hypointense-rim in the HB phase0.378(0.130-1.098)0.074
Intratumoral fat0.817(0.319-2.093)0.674
Mosaic architecture1.266(0.553-2.895)0.577
Hyperintensity on DWIN/AN/AN/A
Hypointensity ADC map0.935(0.426-2.050)0.866
Tumor margin
Smooth (baseline)
Non-smooth1.407(0.594-3.333)0.437
AJCC v.8
cT1a (baseline)1.00Reference
cT1b6.727(1.483-30.517)0.014