Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2019; 25(2): 178-189
Published online Jan 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.178
Published online Jan 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.178
Study | Country | Sample | Strategy | Effect on UGIE referrals |
Cardin et al[18], 2005 | Italy | 2098 patients | Distribution of a locally adapted international guideline, changing referral criteria. | Reduction: 63% (at first) and 42% (at repeat presentation) |
Elwyn et al[20], 2007 | United Kingdom | 215 PCPh, 359 hospital physicians | Feedback on referrals after distribution of adapted guideline. | Reduction: PCPh 9% (NS), Hospital physicians 31% |
Banait et al[21], 2003 | United Kingdom | 114 PCPr | Educational program, including workshops, hand-outs, and reinforcement visit (intervention), vs passive guideline dissemination (control) | Appropriateness of referrals: Intervention 73%, Control 50% |
Shaw et al[22], 2006 | United Kingdom | 47 PCPr | Promotion of HP testing, serology service, and treatment advice (intervention), vs reserved approach to HP testing | Reduction: Intervention: 27%, Control: 4% |
- Citation: de Jong JJ, Lantinga MA, Drenth JP. Prevention of overuse: A view on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(2): 178-189
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i2/178.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i2.178