Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2019; 25(19): 2338-2353
Published online May 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2338
Published online May 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2338
Table 3 Lymph node information at baseline and after chemotherapy
Variable | No. of patients (%) |
At baselinePAN station involved number | |
1-2 | 35 (72.9) |
3-4 | 13 (27.1) |
PAN station involved | |
n16a1 | 8 (16.7) |
n16a2 | 24 (50.0) |
n16b1 | 34 (70.8) |
n16b2 | 9 (18.8) |
Clinical response after chemotherapy | |
Overall (RECIST) | |
Target lesions | |
CR | 2 (4.2) |
PR | 16 (33.3) |
SD | 6 (12.5) |
PD | 2 (4.2) |
Non-target lesions only | |
CR | 1 (2.1) |
Non-CR/Non-PD | 19 (39.6) |
PD | 2 (4.2) |
Primary lesions (JGCA) | |
CR | 3 (6.3) |
PR | 22 (45.8) |
SD | 19 (39.6) |
PD | 4 (8.3) |
Metastatic lesions | |
CR | 24 (50.0) |
Non-CR | 24 (50.0) |
- Citation: Zheng XH, Zhang W, Yang L, Du CX, Li N, Xing GS, Tian YT, Xie YB. Role of D2 gastrectomy in gastric cancer with clinical para-aortic lymph node metastasis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(19): 2338-2353
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i19/2338.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2338