Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2018; 24(7): 810-818
Published online Feb 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.810
Published online Feb 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.810
Univariate | Multivariate | |||
Factor | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value |
CTC count (high vs low) | 4.4 (1.7-11.7) | 0.001 | 3.7 (1.2-12.4) | 0.03 |
Age (≥ 65 vs <65 yr old) | 0.7 (0.3-1.8) | 0.46 | 1.0 (0.9-1.1) | 0.76 |
ECOG (2-4 vs 0-1) | 7.2 (2.2-23.7) | 0.0002 | 2.3 (0.5-10.1) | 0.14 |
Sex (male vs female) | 1.2 (0.4-3.8) | 0.7 | 0.7 (0.2-2.1) | 0.49 |
Stage (IV vs II-III) | 10.0 (3.3-30.8) | < 0.0001 | 9.9 (2.9-33.8) | 0.0003 |
Primary tumor location (gastric vs oesophageal/GOJ) | 0.3 (0.1-1.01) | 0.05 | 0.4 (0.2-1.6) | 0.22 |
- Citation: Brungs D, Lynch D, Luk AW, Minaei E, Ranson M, Aghmesheh M, Vine KL, Carolan M, Jaber M, de Souza P, Becker TM. Cryopreservation for delayed circulating tumor cell isolation is a valid strategy for prognostic association of circulating tumor cells in gastroesophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(7): 810-818
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i7/810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.810