Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2018; 24(48): 5462-5476
Published online Dec 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i48.5462
Published online Dec 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i48.5462
Figure 9 At the first day post-injury, controls (c, C) exhibited intensive edema, loss of glands in the vicinity of the perforation, not possible to obtain a complete defect (due to edema, the tissue is disintegrating), scarce inflammation, and neutrophils [c, HE x 4; C, HE x 10 (control)].
In rats treated with BPC 157 (b, B), we noted much less edema and intensive inflammation (mixed-neutro and mono). Fibrin cloth attached to defect (“holding” the edges) (b, HEx4; B, HEx10 (BPC 157)).
- Citation: Drmic D, Samara M, Vidovic T, Malekinusic D, Antunovic M, Vrdoljak B, Ruzman J, Milkovic Perisa M, Horvat Pavlov K, Jeyakumar J, Seiwerth S, Sikiric P. Counteraction of perforated cecum lesions in rats: Effects of pentadecapeptide BPC 157, L-NAME and L-arginine. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(48): 5462-5476
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i48/5462.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i48.5462