Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2018; 24(46): 5203-5214
Published online Dec 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5203
Published online Dec 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5203
Pre-transplant organ failures | None of the existing organ failure scores used in liver transplant (MELD, BAR, SOFT, UCLA) or in ICU (SOFA, CLIF SOFA) are capable of predicting post-transplant survival of critically ill ACLF patients |
Individual organ failures should be precisely examined. Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, high lactate level and coma have each been shown to be associated with poor post-transplant outcome | |
Dynamic perspective on ACLF and optimal timing for LT | Patients with ACLF have very different evolutive profiles during their first week of treatment. |
Admission criteria in ICU should therefore be lenient in order to re-evaluate patients 3 to 7 d after admission and their evolutive profile should be taken into consideration when deciding to transplant them or not. | |
Sepsis | The link between pre-transplant bacterial infection and post-transplant mortality is controversial but sepsis does not seem to be sufficient to exclude patients from LT per se. In some circumstances, sepsis and septic shock can be difficult to distinguish from SIRS in patients with severe ACLF. |
By contrast, there is a consensus regarding invasive fungal infections, which constitutes a strict contraindication to LT. | |
General medical condition and risk factors of patients | There is little data on the effect of age, comorbidities and alcohol abuse history on the post-transplant prognosis of patients with severe ACLF, in part because different transplant teams apply center-specific selection criteria on patients prior to listing. |
The attitude described in the literature on LT in alcoholic hepatitis is, to date, the best guide to decide as early as possible whether to (de) list patients admitted for severe ACLF or not. |
- Citation: Artzner T, Michard B, Besch C, Levesque E, Faitot F. Liver transplantation for critically ill cirrhotic patients: Overview and pragmatic proposals. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(46): 5203-5214
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i46/5203.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5203