Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2018; 24(40): 4578-4585
Published online Oct 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i40.4578
Table 3 Comparison of details between patients
Patient No.Tumor locationOperation typeStent typeDuration for Symptom improvementStent patencyDuration from operation to stent placementHospital stay after stent insertionTotal hospital stay
1AntrumLADG (B-I)90-mm covered stent275817731
2AntrumLADG (B-I)90-mm covered-stent38025534
3Mid bodyLADG (B-I)70-mm covered stent1211428738
4Low bodyLADG (B-II)90-mm covered stent25427635
5Low bodyLADG (B-I)90-mm covered stent21731336
6BodyLADG (B-II)70-mm covered stent66261037
7AntrumLADG (B-II)110-mm covered stent5194231342
8BodyLADG (B-I)90-mm covered stent39281242
9AntrumLADG (B-II)70-mm covered stent21414425
10AntrumLADG (B-II)90-mm covered stent19812521
11AntrumLADG (B-I)90-mm covered stent5824835
12Low bodyLADG (B-I)70-mm covered stent116757221
13BodyLADG (B-II)110-mm covered stent22414623
14AntrumLADG (B-II)90-mm covered stent2409825
15AntrumLADG (B-I)90-mm covered stent15115320
16AntrumLADG (B-II)90-mm covered stent14223227
17BodyLADG (B-II)90-mm covered stent164112135
18BodyLADG (B-I)90-mm covered stent12321331
19AntrumLADG (B-II)90-mm covered stent149919
20AntrumLADG (B-II)70-mm covered stent0529221