Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2018; 24(35): 4077-4085
Published online Sep 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i35.4077
Published online Sep 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i35.4077
Conventional group(n = 50) | Clip-flap group(n = 44) | P value | ||
Procedure time (min) | 67.3 ± 44.9 | 67.6 ± 48.4 | 0.98 | |
H. pylori infection | Positive | 64.1 ± 27.8 (n = 15) | 65.6 ± 53.1 (n = 19) | 0.92 |
Negative | 68.6 ± 50.7 (n = 35) | 69.1 ± 45.5 (n = 25) | 0.98 | |
Kyoto classification of gastric mucosa | ||||
Atrophy | A2 | 68.7 ± 45.2 (n = 44) | 70.3 ± 49.7 (n = 40) | 0.87 |
A0 + 1 | 57.2 ± 44.8 (n = 6) | 40.3 ± 17.6 (n = 4) | 0.50 | |
Intestinal metaplasia | IM2 | 71.6 ± 45.8 (n = 31) | 65.2 ± 45.2 (n = 22) | 0.62 |
IM0 + IM1 | 60.2 ± 43.6 (n = 19) | 70.0 ± 52.3 (n = 22) | 0.53 | |
Tumor | ||||
Histological diagnosis | Adenoma | 36.5 ± 11.1 (n = 6) | 58.0 ± 40.2 (n = 3) | 0.24 |
Cancer | 71.5 ± 46.1 (n = 44) | 68.3 ± 49.3 (n = 41) | 0.76 | |
Differentiation | tub1 + tub2 | 71.1 ± 46.6 (n = 43) | 69.0 ± 49.7 (n = 40) | 0.85 |
Por + sig | 90 (n = 1) | 40 (n = 1) | - | |
Depth | m | 71.4 ± 47.2 (n = 42) | 62.7 ± 40.1 (n = 38) | 0.38 |
sm | 74.0 ± 1.4 (n = 2) | 139.6 ± 97.1 (n = 3) | 0.43 | |
Location | Upper | 119.8 ± 60.9 (n=6) | 158.5 ± 101.1 (n=2) | 0.52 |
Middle | 74.8 ± 37.3 (n = 19) | 91.4 ± 52.1 (n = 14) | 0.29 | |
Lower | 49.0 ± 34.7 (n = 25) | 49.2 ± 28.0 (n = 28) | 0.98 | |
Major axis of tumor (mm) | < 10 | 50.0 ± 35.9 (n = 24) | 46.6 ± 31.0 (n = 20) | 0.74 |
10 <, < 20 | 72.3 ± 46.2 (n = 16) | 59.8 ± 23.7 (n = 14) | 0.37 | |
20 < | 100.8 ± 44.9 (n = 10) | 120.5 ± 64.5 (n = 10) | 0.44 | |
ESD | ||||
Area of specimen (mm2) | < 500 | 33.8 ± 14.0 (n = 22) | 53.2 ± 51.7 (n = 15) | 0.17 |
500 <, < 1000 | 72.6 ± 38.4 (n = 16) | 71.1 ± 29.3 (n = 23) | 0.89 | |
1000 < | 86.0 ± 32.1 (n = 12) | 138.5 ± 79.3 (n = 9) | 0.06 | |
Coagulation of vessels at 2nd look | Done | 69.5 ± 38.4 (n = 13) | 67.4 ± 28.8 (n = 12) | 0.89 |
No | 66.5 ± 47.4 (n = 37) | 67.6 ± 52.6 (n = 35) | 0.92 | |
Delayed bleeding (n, %) | 105.7 ± 23.7 (n = 3) | 80 (n = 1) | - | |
Perforation (n, %) | 71 (n = 1) | 234 (n = 1) | - | |
Operator | ||||
Procedure times | < 50 times | 61.1 ± 37.1 (n = 39) | 58.8 ± 32.1 (n = 36) | 0.78 |
> 50 times | 89.3 ± 62.9 (n = 11) | 107.0 ± 83.9 (n = 8) | 0.60 |
- Citation: Ban H, Sugimoto M, Otsuka T, Murata M, Nakata T, Hasegawa H, Inatomi O, Bamba S, Andoh A. Usefulness of the clip-flap method of endoscopic submucosal dissection: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(35): 4077-4085
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i35/4077.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i35.4077