Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3786-3798
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3786
Table 2 Comparison and univariate analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound features between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma n (%)
CEUS featuresICC1 (n = 62)HCC1 (n = 55)P valueOR(95%CI)
Irregular shape31 (50.0)9 (16.4)0.0005.037(2.002, 13.786)
Hyper-enhanced in arterial phase55 (88.7)54 (98.2)0.0650.147(0.003, 1.210)
Hypo/iso-enhanced in arterial phase7 (11.3)1 (1.8)0.0656.783(0.827, 314.886)
Hypo-enhanced in portal phase61 (98.4)40 (72.7)0.00022.391(3.206, 973.549)
Hypo-enhanced in late phase61 (98.4)51 (92.7)0.1864.728(0.449, 239.097)
Rim-enhancement40 (64.5)1 (1.8)0.00094.271(14.202, 3946.676)
Early washout (< 60 s)57 (91.9)17 (30.9)0.00024.563(8.022, 92.533)
Duration of enhancement (< 30 s)49 (79.0)11 (20)0.00014.614(5.653, 41.160)
Tumor supply artery12 (19.4)29 (52.7)0.0004.581(1.904, 11.618)
Peripheral circular artery or tumor capsule2 (3.2)14 (25.5)0.00010.060(2.137, 95.937)
Intra-tumoral vein36 (58.1)2 (3.6)0.00035.556(8.118, 327.503)
Obscure boundary of tumor43 (69.4)12 (21.8)0.0007.942(3.268, 20.550)
Obscure boundary of intra-tumoral non-enhanced area40 (64.5)1 (1.8)0.00094.271(14.202, 3946.676)
Marked washout38 (61.3)1 (1.8)0.00082.367(12.448, 3454.264)