Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3776-3785
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3776
Table 2 Comparison of procedural outcomes and oncologic outcomes between the primary endoscopic submucosal dissection group and secondary endoscopic submucosal dissection group
ESD
Secondary ESD
P value
(n = 1595, %)(n = 28, %)
Lesion size [mm, mean (SD)]17.4 (12.8)16.4 (13.2)0.664
Specimen size [mm, mean (SD)]38.1 (14.6)47.8 (19.6)0.001
Whole procedure time [min, mean (SD)]55.1 (41.5)78.2 (38.0)0.004
Dissection time [min, mean (SD)]36.7 (34.7)63.4 (38.0)< 0.001
Dissection speed [mm2/min, mean (SD)]38.7 (32.8)22.1 (12.7)< 0.001
Complication61 (3.8)3 (10.7)0.095
Perforation37 (2.3)0 (0.0)
Bleeding15 (0.9)1 (3.6)
Aspiration pneumonia13 (0.8)2 (7.1)
Hospital stay [d, mean (SD)]3.6 (3.2)3.9 (2.5)0.639
En bloc resection1574 (98.7)26 (92.9)0.058
Curative resection1383 (86.7)25 (89.3)1.000
Additive salvage treatment104 (6.5)3 (10.7)0.425
Additive surgery85 (5.3)2 (7.1)
Redo ESD16 (1.0)1 (3.6)
Argon plasma coagulation3 (0.2)0 (0.0)