Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2018; 24(22): 2392-2399
Published online Jun 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2392
Table 2 Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures n (%)
Head group (n = 131)Body/tail group (n = 16)P value
EST98 (75.4)15 (93.8)0.12
Precut of Vater’s papilla43 (33.1)5 (31.3)1
EPBD8 (6.2)0 (0)0.6
Pancreatic stent migration within 1 wk26 (19.8)0 (0)0.076
Procedure time, median (range), min60 (20-150)160 (40-120)20.31
Type of stent
Zimmon 5 Fr, 2 cm3
Zimmon 5 Fr, 4 cm1
Geenen 5 Fr, 3 cm59
Geenen 5 Fr, 5 cm58
Geenen 5 Fr, 7 cm1112
Geenen 5 Fr, 9 cm4
p-AMY after ERCP, median (range), IU/L138.5 (7.0-2086)378.5 (5.0-1266.5)0.03
PEP12 (9.2)0 (0)0.363
Mild2
Moderate8
Severe2