Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2018; 24(2): 274-289
Published online Jan 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274
Published online Jan 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274
AuthorCountries | Year,Type of publication | N° patientsrandomization | SiteStage | Regimen | Response rate | Resectability rate | Survival rate (HR; p) | Node dissection (D1,D2, others) |
Yonemura et al[29] Japan | 1993 Abstract | 55 Tot 29 NAC + S 26 S | GC IV | PMUE | Adv NAC + S | Adv NAC + S | Adv NAC+S Rates NR | NR |
Shchepotin et al[30] Ukraine | 1995 Abstract | 146 Tot 50 S 49 IVCH + S 47 IACH + S | GC NR | NR | Adv IACH + S | Adv IACH + S | Adv IACH + S P < 0.001 | NR |
Kang et al[31] South Korea | 1996 Abstract | 107 Tot 54 S 53 NAC + S | GC III/IV | PEF | NR | Adv NAC + S | No difference P = 0.114 | NR |
Lygidakis et al[32] Greece | 1999 Paper | 59 Tot 19 S 20 NAC + S + IVCH 20 NAC + S | GC All stages | Mitomycin-C + 5-FU + FA + Farmorubicin | NR | NR | Adv NAC + S + IVCH | NR |
Takiguchi et al[33] Japan | 2000 Abstract | 262 Tot 139 S 123 NAC + S | GC III/IV | 5FU + CDDP | Adv NAC + S | Adv NAC+S | Adv NAC + S P = 0.0996 | NR |
Wang et al[22] China | 2000 Paper | 60 Tot 30 S 30 NAC + S | EGJ NR | 5FU | Adv NAC + S | NR | Adv NAC + S P = 0.17 | NR |
Kobayashi et al[35] Japan | 2000 Paper | 171 Tot 80 S 91 NAC + S | AGC | FUDR | NR | NR | Adv S P = 0.010 | NR |
Hartgrink et al[4] The Netherlands | 2004 Paper | 59 Tot 30 S 29 NAC + S | Proper AGC (not EGC) | FAMTX | 32% CR or PR | EQUAL | Adv S 34% S vs 21% NAC + S P = 0.017 | At least 15 nodes |
Nio et al[36] Japan | 2004 Paper | 295 Tot 193 S 102 NAC + S | GC All stages > 50% stage I | UFT | NR | NR | Overall No Adv. NAC + S P = 0.6878 stage II/III -pN + Adv. NAC + S P = 0.0486 | D2 48% S 56% NAC + S |
Zhao et al[37] China | 2006 Paper | 60 Tot 20 5’-DFUR 20 5FU + CF 20 S | GC All stages | 5’-DFUR Or 5FU+CF | 5’-DFUR and 5FU + CF increase AI and reduce PI | NR | NR | NR |
Cunningham et al[17] United Kingdom | 2006 Paper | 503 Tot 250 S 253 NAC + S | GC, EGJ, LE All stages | Epirubicin Cisplatinum 5-FU | Diameter 5 cm vs 3 cm P < 0.001 T1 + T2 stages > NAC + S P = 0.002 | NR | Adv NAC + S OS/DFS 23% S 36.3%/NAC+S HR 0.75/0.66 P = 0.009/0.001 more evident for EGJ | D2 40% S 42% NAC + S |
Schumacher et al[15] Germany | 2010 Paper | 282/144 Tot 72 S 72 NAC + S | GC, EGJ (Siewert II, III) stages III, IV | Cisplatinum + FF | Adv in S Tumor length, thickness and width and P Stages more | R0 67% S 81.9% NAC + S P = 0.036 LN + 76.5% S 61.4% NAC + S P = 0.018 | No Adv NAC + S 52 ms S 64 ms NAC + S HR = 0.84 P = 0.46 | D2 94% 92.6% S 95.7% NAC + S |
Imano et al[38] Japan | 2010 Paper | 63 Tot 16 S 15 CDDP 16 5-FU 16 5-FU + CDDP | GC NR | 5FU or CDDP or 5F +CDDP | 5-FU + CDDP Increases AI Reduces PI | NR | No differences in 4 arms | D2 in all arms |
Biffi et al[39] Italy | 2010 Paper | 240/70 Tot 35 S 34 NAC + S | EGJ (Siewert II, III), AG | TCF | 65% CR + PR | Adv NAC + S (P value NR) | not evaluated premature interruption for low accrual | D2 in almost all cases |
Qu et al[40] China | 2010 Paper | 78 Tot 39 S 39 NAC + S | AGC | Paclitaxel and FOLFOX4 | Adv NAC + S P = 0.001 | Adv NAC + S P = 0.025 | Adv NAC+S P = 0.006 at 2 yr | NR |
Ychou et al[18] France | 2011 Paper | 224 Tot 111 S 113 NAC + S | LE,EGJ,GC All stages | CDDP + 5FU | Adv NAC + S P = 0.054 | Adv NAC + S P = 0.04 | OS (NAC + S/S) = 38/24 HR = 0.69 P = 0.02 DFS (NAC + S/S) = 34/19 HR= 0.65 P = 0.003 more evident for EGJ | D2 recommended No data on the effect of D2 vs other LN dissection |
- Citation: Reddavid R, Sofia S, Chiaro P, Colli F, Trapani R, Esposito L, Solej M, Degiuli M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake? World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(2): 274-289
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i2/274.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.274