Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2018; 24(18): 1978-1988
Published online May 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i18.1978
Table 1 Systematic review and meta-analysis: Stents vs gastrojejunostomy
Ref.Type of studyGJ studiesSurgeryEndoscopic stentNo differences
Minata et al[8], 2016Systematic reviewLGJ (Mehta 2006, Jeurnink 2010) OGJ (Jeurnink 2010, Fiori 2013)Lower re-intervention rateLess invasive COVERED: Higher migration UNCOVERED: Higher obstructionTechnical success Complications
Nagaraja et al[13], 2014Meta-analisisLaparoscopic GJ (Mittal 2004, Mehta 2006, Jeurnink 2007, Jeurnink 2010)Shorter LOSTechnical and clinical outcomes
Ly et al[38], 2010Systematic reviewOpen GJ (Jeurnink 2007, El-Shabrawi 2006, Mehta 2006, Espinal 2006, Mejia 2006, del Piano 2005, Maetani 2005, Fiori 2004, Mittal 2004, Maetani 2004, Johnsson 2004, Wong 2002, Yim 2001) Laparoscopic GJ (Jeurnink 2007, Mehta 2006, Mittal 2004)More major medical complicationsMore likely to tolerate an oral intake More likely to tolerate an oral diet earlier Shorter LOSSurvival 30 d-mortality Major complications