Compared efficacy of preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantation: Meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1812

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 24, Issue 16

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9126)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

785

HTML

5509

Figures (1-3)

281

Tables (1-3)

276

Sum=6851

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

966

Download

1309

Sum=2275

Apr 28, 2018 (publication date) through Dec 31, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (24)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2018; 24(16): 1812-1824
Published online Apr 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1812

Table 1 Ingredients in the investigated preservation solutions

	UW	HTK	CS	IGL-1
HES	0.25	-	-	-
PEG-35	-	-	-	0.03
Na⁺	27	15	100	120
K⁺	125	10	15	25

Concentrations are expressed in mmol/L. HES: Hydroxyethyl starch; PEG-35: Polyethylene glycol 35 kDa.

Citation: Szilágyi ÁL, Mátrai P, Hegyi P, Tuboly E, Pécz D, Garami A, Solymár M, Pétervári E, Balaskó M, Veres G, Czopf L, Wobbe B, Szabó D, Wagner J, Hartmann P. Compared efficacy of preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantation: Meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(16): 1812-1824
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i16/1812.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1812