Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2018; 24(16): 1803-1811
Published online Apr 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803
Published online Apr 28, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803
Table 3 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings and complications according to group and subgroup
Variable | Groups | Total, n = 102 | P value | ||
Group I, n = 51 | Group II, n = 51 | ||||
GWC, n = 39 | Difficult cannulation, n = 12 | ||||
Complications, pancreatitis, bleeding or perforation | 0.062 | ||||
No | 34 (87.2) | 10 (83.3) | 50 (98) | 94 (92.2) | |
Yes | 5 (12.8) | 2 (16.7) | 1 (2) | 8 (7.8) | |
Number of cannulations | < 0.0011 | ||||
Mean ± σ | 3.3 ± 1.9 | 7.5 ± 2.8 | 4.3 ± 2.8 | ||
Median (min.; max.) | 3 (1; 10) | 8.5 (3; 10) | 3 (1; 10) |
- Citation: Furuya CK, Sakai P, Marinho FRT, Otoch JP, Cheng S, Prudencio LL, de Moura EGH, Artifon ELA. Papillary fistulotomy vs conventional cannulation for endoscopic biliary access: A prospective randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(16): 1803-1811
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i16/1803.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i16.1803