Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2018; 24(14): 1562-1578
Published online Apr 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1562
Published online Apr 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1562
Table 3 Evaluation of the complications or outcomes in enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care groups in the included studies
Subgroup | Studies, n | Participants, n | Statistical method | Effect estimate | Heterogeneity | |
I2 | P value | |||||
Total complications | 13 | 1092 | Risk ratio (M-H, random, 95%CI) | 1.03 [0.73, 1.44] | 75% | < 0.00001 |
Anastomotic leak | 10 | 964 | Risk ratio (M-H, random, 95%CI) | 1.36 [0.54, 3.45] | 0 | 0.50 |
Ileus | 12 | 1048 | Risk ratio (M-H, random, 95%CI) | 1.62 [0.75, 3.52] | 0 | 0.57 |
Incision infection | 11 | 1007 | Risk ratio (M-H, random, 95%CI) | 0.79 [0.39, 1.60] | 0 | 0.87 |
Urinary tract infection | 9 | 699 | Risk ratio (M-H, random, 95%CI) | 0.53 [0.26, 1.08] | 0 | 0.99 |
Pulmonary infection | 9 | 775 | Risk ratio (M-H, random, 95%CI) | 0.52 [0.28, 0.94] | 0 | 0.99 |
Postoperative hospital stay | 13 | 1092 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -1.65 [-2.09, -1.21] | 89% | < 0.00001 |
Duration of first flatus | 11 | 882 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -12.70 [-19.71, -5.69] | 92% | < 0.00001 |
Duration of first defecation | 4 | 471 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -28.07 [-41.48, -14.67] | 90% | < 0.00001 |
Medical costs | 10 | 819 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -0.50 [-0.69, -0.30] | 85% | < 0.00001 |
CRP | ||||||
POD1 | 8 | 514 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -14.81 [-21.42, -8.21] | 72% | 0.0007 |
POD4 | 6 | 378 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -19.81 [-29.64, -9.98] | 64% | 0.02 |
POD7 | 5 | 258 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -21.36 [-28.81, -13.91] | 74% | 0.004 |
IL-6 | ||||||
POD1 | 4 | 239 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -61.22 [-114.58, -7.86] | 99% | < 0.00001 |
POD4 | 3 | 147 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -31.50 [-55.63, -7.38] | 96% | < 0.00001 |
POD7 | 3 | 176 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | -26.62 [-34.23, -19.01] | 89% | 0.0001 |
ALB | ||||||
POD1 | 2 | 84 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | 0.24 [-0.89, 1.36] | 0 | 0.79 |
POD4 | 4 | 166 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | 3.27 [2.24, 4.30] | 23% | 0.27 |
POD7 | 4 | 166 | Mean difference (IV, random, 95%CI) | 5.68 [3.31, 8.05] | 83% | 0.0005 |
Readmission | 8 | 777 | Risk ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95%CI) | 2.86 [1.31, 6.24] | 0 | 0.92 |
Reoperation | 3 | 517 | Risk ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95%CI) | 0.62 [0.17, 2.35] | 33% | 0.22 |
Quality of life | 2 | 136 | Std. mean difference (IV, Fixed, 95%CI) | -0.46 [-0.80, -0.12] | 36% | 0.21 |
- Citation: Wang LH, Zhu RF, Gao C, Wang SL, Shen LZ. Application of enhanced recovery after gastric cancer surgery: An updated meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(14): 1562-1578
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i14/1562.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1562