Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2018; 24(1): 69-75
Published online Jan 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.69
Table 2 Treatment effect judgment
Drainage effect< 80 yr old (Group A; n = 184)≥ 80 yr old (Group B; n = 88)P value
Bile duct diameter prior to drainage (mm)11.350 ± 3.6310 (4-23)12.819 ± 3.3148 (5-22)NS
Stenosis length prior to drainage (mm)27.216 ± 12.688 (5-59)27.292 ± 12.702(6-52)NS
ALT prior to drainage (IU/L)162.767 ± 104.768 (29-851)127.567 ± 104.760(30-838)NS
ALT post drainage (IU/L)78.875 ± 159.482 (10-278)66.039 ± 143.106 (13-270)NS
ALP prior to drainage (IU/L)1529.375 ± 1465.465 (409-2620)1489.447 ± 1102.192 (432-2512)NS
ALP post drainage (IU/L)871.000 ± 803.131 (326-1855)665.622 ± 557.643 (331-1811)NS
T-Bil prior to drainage (mg/dl)5.438 ± 6.512 (0.4-27.8)5.276 ± 5.858 (0.6-27)NS
T-Bil post drainage (mg/dl)2.387 ± 3.879 (0.4-12.2)1.580 ± 3.943 (0.6-12)NS
Chemotherapeutic effect
CR00NS
PR124NS
SD7870.0000
PD164NS
Total106150.0000
Best supportive care78730.0000