Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2018; 24(1): 124-138
Published online Jan 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124
Published online Jan 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124
Continent | Country/region | Year | Age | Screening tests recommended | Recommendation | Note |
Asia | South Korea | 2012 | ≥ 50 | Colonoscopy (at least 5 years) is the priority OR FOBT (FIT) OR CTC OR DCBE | Colonoscopy (strong recommendation; low-quality evidence) with 5-year interval (weak recommendation; very low-quality evidence). FOBT (strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence). CTC (strong recommendation; low-quality evidence). DCBE (weak recommendation; low-quality evidence) | FS efficacy is recognized, but FS not widely used because it doesn't explore entire colon, might need a colonoscopy after, and FS less preferred by individuals and physicians |
China | 2014 | 50-74 | FOBT (chemical FOBT or FIT) + Questionnaire every 3 yr | - | ||
Asia Pacific | 2015 | 50-75 | FIT (preferred choice) OR FS OR colonoscopy (intervals not mentioned) | A for FIT; A for FS; B for colonoscopy | FIT is preferred over gFOBT | |
Saudi Arabia | 2015 | 45-69 | Colonoscopy (10 yr) is the recommended modality; if not possible: FS (5 yr)+ FIT/gFOBT (1 yr) OR FS (3 yr) | Colonoscopy: Strong recommendation; low-quality evidence. FS: Strong recommendation; moderate-quality evidence. | FIT is preferred over gFOBT. FOBT used alone is not recommended, but could be used depending on availability of other modalities. | |
≥ 70 | Screening not recommended | Conditional recommendation; low-quality evidence | Screening for people over 70 could be beneficial in certain cases (depending on health status) |
- Citation: Bénard F, Barkun AN, Martel M, von Renteln D. Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(1): 124-138
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i1/124.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124