Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2018; 24(1): 104-111
Published online Jan 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.104
Table 3 Pathological outcomes n (%)
VariableExperimental group (n = 155)Control group (n = 176)P value
Tumor size (cm; mean ± SD)4.0 ± 0.84.1 ± 0.80.205
Proximal resection margin (cm; mean ± SD)16.2 ± 7.115.4 ± 7.30.309
Distal resection margin (cm; mean ± SD)2.2 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.40.477
No. of lymph nodes harvested (mean ± SD)22.8 ± 5.321.7 ± 5.00.375
No. of patients with lymph nodes harvested < 1210 (6.5)13 (7.4)0.830
Differentiation degree0.963
Good45 (29.0)50 (28.4)
Moderate62 (40.0)73 (41.5)
Poor48 (31.0)53 (30.1)
Pathological pattern0.785
Canalicular adenocarcinoma108 (69.7)125 (71.0)
Mucinous adenocarcinoma25 (16.1)22 (12.5)
Papillary adenocarcinoma12 (7.7)16 (9.1)
Signet-ring carcinoma10 (6.5)13 (7.4)
Nerve invasion30 (19.4)37 (21.0)0.706
Vessel invasion26 (16.8)30 (17.0)0.948
Positive distal margin0 (0)0 (0)N/A
Positive CRM0 (0)0 (0)N/A
pTNM stage0.807
I38 (24.5)45 (25.6)
II61 (39.4)70 (39.8)
III44 (28.4)52 (29.5)
IV12 (7.7)9 (5.1)