Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1627-1636
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1627
Table 1 Patient characteristics and endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography related data n (%) (n = 244)
CharacteristicsValue
Age (yr), mean ± SD (range)70.8 ± 10.2 (44-95)
Sex
Male130 (53.3)
Female114 (46.7)
Aspirin3 (1.2)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL), pre-procedure, mean ± SD (range)7.09 ± 6.45 (0.2-28.9)
Normal53 (21.7)
Elevated191 (78.3)
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure14 (5.7)
Cholangitis, pre-procedure68 (27.9)
Diagnosis
Cholangiocarcinoma118 (48.4)
Hilar75 (63.6)
Distal43 (36.4)
Pancreatic cancer79 (32.4)
Head68 (86.1)
Body/Tail11 (13.9)
Gallbladder cancer21 (8.6)
Ampullary cancer18 (7.4)
Hepatocellular carcinoma3 (1.2)
Others5 (2.0)
Pancreatic duct invasion
Yes85 (34.8)
No159 (65.2)
Lymph node metastasis
Yes170 (69.7)
No73 (29.9)
Pancreatic duct injection
0187 (76.6)
1-224 (9.8)
333 (13.5)
ERPD4 (1.6)
Stent success rate244 (100)
Number of initially inserted SEMS
1230 (94.3)
214 (5.7)
Stent type
Uncovered190 (77.9)
Covered54 (22.1)
Post-ERCP complication
Present9 (3.7)
Absent'234 (95.9)
Post-ERCP complication type
Pancreatitis7 (2.9)
Mild / moderate6 (2.5)/1 (0.4)
Bleeding, mild2 (0.8)
Perforation0 (0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia30 (12.3)
Stent complication
None199 (81.6)
Stent occlusion44 (18.0)
Stent migration1 (0.4)
Patency
No further procedure199 (81.6)
ERBD restent1 (0.4)
SEMS restent32 (13.1)
PTBD12 (4.9)