Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2017; 23(8): 1450-1457
Published online Feb 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i8.1450
Table 1 Association analysis of immunohistochemistry staining for Arpin vs clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer, n (%)
Clinicopathological featuresNumber of patients (n = 176)Arpin expression
χ2P value
High (n = 54)Low (n = 122)
Age (yr)
> 5097 (55.11)29 (29.90)68 (70.10)0.0630.802
≤ 5079 (44.89)25 (31.65)54 (68.35)
Gender
Male110 (62.50)31 (28.18)79 (71.82)0.8650.353
Female66 (37.50)23 (34.85)43 (65.15)
Tumer size (cm)
> 5120 (68.18)37 (30.83)83 (69.17)0.0040.949
≤ 556 (31.82)17 (30.36)39 (69.64)
Depth of invasion
T1 + T244 (25.00)24 (54.55)20 (45.45)15.790.000
T3 + T4132 (75.00)30 (22.73)102 (77.27)
Lymph node metastasis
Yes131 (74.43)25 (19.08)106 (80.92)32.4040.000
No45 (25.57)29 (64.44)16 (35.56)
TNM stage
I70 (39.77)30 (42.86)40 (57.14)9.3790.009
II50 (28.41)14 (28.00)36 (72.00)
III56 (31.82)10 (17.86)16 (82.14)
Histology
Well + moderate80 (45.45)21 (26.25)59 (73.75)1.3540.245
Poor96 (54.55)33 (34.38)63 (65.62)
Tumor site
Upper66 (37.50)24 (36.36)42 (63.64)1.6480.439
Middle16 (9.09)4 (25.00)12 (75.00)
Low94 (53.41)26 (27.66)68 (72.34)