Systematic Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2017; 23(45): 8073-8081
Published online Dec 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i45.8073
Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the included studies
AuthorYear of publicationInclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
Yamamoto et al[13]2004- Retrospective review of all DBEs- NR
- Dilatation criteria NR
Pohl et al[16]2006- Known or suspected CD and proven or suspicious small bowel strictures- Strictures > 5 cm or including significant angulation or severe active inflammation with ulcerations
- Dilatation criteria NR
Ohmiya et al[17]2009- Patients with SBO- Acute obstruction with strangulation or suspected perforation
- The stricture was assumed to be restricted within narrow limits in the small bowel assessed by radiologic imaging- A stricture with a deep open ulcer
- A second dilation session was only performed if obstructive symptoms recurred
Despott et al[18]2011- CD patients with small bowel stricture- Strictures > 5 cm
- Dilatation criteria NR
Hayashi et al[19]2008- Retrospective case series of all patients who had undergone DBE-NR
- In the case of a diaphragm-like stricture, all the strictures were dilated
Hirai et al[11]2014CD patients with:- Stricture of the ileocolonic anastomosis
- Small bowel strictures causing obstructive symptoms- Post-dilatation observation period < 6 mo
- Stricture length ≤ 5 cm- Patients who did not meet dilatation criteria
- No associated fistula or abscess
- no deep ulcer
- No severe curvature of the stricture
Gill et al[20]2014- Retrospective review: All patients with suspected strictures in the small bowel undergoing DBE- Patients with severely ulcerated or inflamed strictures
- Dilatation criteria NR- Patients in whom the scope could not traverse the stricture
Irani et al[21]2012- Clinical and radiological evidence (CT or small bowel follow through) of small bowel obstruction- Malignant strictures and masses found either at video capsule endoscopy or DBE
Nishimura et al[22]2011- Patients with ischemic enteritis and a segment of intestine that could not be passed by the enteroscope- Deep ulcerations
- Dilation was indicated when there were symptoms of intestinal obstruction and evidence of caliber change by CT scan
Fukumoto et al[23]2007A stricture was defined by 1 or more of the following criteria:-Asymptomatic patient (even when the endoscope did not pass through the stricture)
- DBE showed the internal diameter of the bowel lumen to be < 10 mm or the endoscope could not pass through the lesion
- The patient complained of obstructive symptoms
- Stricture was suggested or identified by other modalities.
Sunada et al[24]2016- Retrospective review of all DBEs-NR
- Dilatation criteria NR
Kita et al[25]2006- Retrospective review of all DBEs-NR
- Dilatation criteria NR
Kroner et al[2]2015- Retrospective review of consecutive patients who were found to have small bowel stricture at the time of DBE- Malignant (appearance of) strictures
- Benign appearance of the stricture