Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2017; 23(45): 8027-8034
Published online Dec 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i45.8027
Table 2 Characteristics of the study population n (%)
VariableStudy population
Demographic data
Male gender45 (61)
Age, median (range), yr62.5 (40-80)
body mass index, mean ± SD, kg/m225.36 ± 4.42
Tumor markers
CEA level, mean ± SD (mg/L)17 ± 3.5
Ca 19.9 level, mean ± SD (UI/L)23 ± 5.2
Primary tumor site
Ascending colon10 (14)
Transverse colon5 (7)
Descending colon33 (45)
Rectum25 (34)
Liver metastases
Median (range) number of preoperative LM3 (1-14)
Synchronous LM55 (75)
Surgical procedure
Right hepatectomy15 (16)
Left lobectomy4 (4)
Right lobectomy3 (3)
Posterior segmentectomy8 (11)
Wedge58 (66)
Two-stage hepatectomy15 (17)
Site of the 300 metastases (%)
I2.5
II10
III17.5
IV11
V16
VI20
VII13
VIII10
Preoperative chemotherapy
Regimen
Folfox28 (32)
Folfiri/Folfox and bevacizumab28 (32)
Folfiri with or without cetuximab8 (9)
Campto or folfiri with or without cetuximab20 (23)
Folfirinox4 (4)
Median (range) number of preoperative cycles12 (4-38)
Pathology
T stage
27 (9)
356 (77)
410 (14)
N stage
018 (24)
137 (51)
211 (15)
X7 (10)
Median (range) size of metastases, cm3.1 (0.2-5)
PRPC
Rubbia-Brandt classification
Major response13 (15)
Partial response12 (14)
Absence of response63 (71)
MD Anderson classification
Complete response8 (9)
Major response26 (30)
Minor response54 (61)