Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2017; 23(44): 7863-7874
Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7863
Table 4 Adjusted HRs and 95%CIs for the association between hepatocellular carcinoma development and different variables
CriteriaHR95%CIP value
Rotterdam
Age1.071.02-1.120.0041
Male sex3.670.69-19.560.128
Cirrhosis4.381.06-18.140.0411
APRI-r1 > 0.543.941.04-14.940.0431
Suboptimal treatment response2.180.45-10.580.334
Paris I
Age1.071.02-1.120.0031
Male sex3.040.54-17.120.207
Albumin0.940.80-1.090.386
Cirrhosis4.371.07-17.750.0391
APRI-r1 > 0.543.921.06-14.540.0411
Suboptimal treatment response1.70.41-7.030.466
Barcelona
Age1.071.02-1.120.0051
Male sex3.260.56-18.960.188
Albumin0.930.80-1.070.307
Cirrhosis4.441.06-18.560.0411
APRI-r1 > 0.544.471.26-15.930.0211
Suboptimal treatment response1.220.33-4.490.768
Toronto
Age1.071.02-1.130.0031
Male sex3.220.56-18.500.19
Albumin0.940.80-1.090.425
Cirrhosis4.561.09-19.170.0381
APRI-r1 > 0.544.161.10-15.690.0361
Suboptimal treatment response1.460.31-6.890.631