Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2017; 23(41): 7450-7458
Published online Nov 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450
Published online Nov 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450
Figure 3 Comparison of the post-endoscopic Rockall score and post-endoscopic Baylor bleeding score for the prediction of death recurrent bleeding, transfusion or surgical intervention.
AUROC: [0.82 (95%CI: 0.79-0.84)] vs [0.69 (95%CI: 0.65-0.72)]; B: AUROC [0.70 (95%CI: 0.67-0.73)] vs [0.73 (95%CI: 0.70-0.76)]; C: AUROC [0.66 (95%CI: 0.62-0.70)] vs [0.65 (95%CI: 0.61-0.69)]; D: AUROC [0.68 (95%CI: 0.65-0.71)] vs [0.74 (95%CI: 0.71-0.77)]. BBS: Baylor bleeding score; RS: Rockall score.
- Citation: Budimir I, Stojsavljević S, Baršić N, Bišćanin A, Mirošević G, Bohnec S, Kirigin LS, Pavić T, Ljubičić N. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(41): 7450-7458
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i41/7450.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450