Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?

doi:10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 23, Issue 41

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (11038)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

707

WORD

361

HTML

6880

Figures (1-3)

237

Tables (1-4)

234

Sum=8419

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

878

Download

1741

Sum=2619

Nov 7, 2017 (publication date) through Dec 2, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (18)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2017; 23(41): 7450-7458
Published online Nov 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, pre-endoscopic Rockall score and pre-endoscopic Baylor bleeding score for the prediction of death, recurrent bleeding, transfusion or surgical intervention. A: AUROC [0.67 (95%CI: 0.64-0.70)] vs [0.82 (95%CI: 0.79-0.84)] vs [0.63 (95%CI: 0.60-0.66)]; B: AUROC [0.75 (95%CI: 0.72-0.78)] vs [0.61 (95%CI: 0.57-0.64)] vs [0.52 (95%CI: 0.49- 0.56)]; C: AUROC [0.83 (95%CI: 0.80-0.85)] vs [0.63 (95%CI: 0.59-0.66)] vs [0.58 (95%CI: 0.55-0.62)]; D: AUROC [0.82 (95%CI: 0.79-0.84)] vs [0.63 (95%CI: 0.60-0.66)] vs [0.52 (95%CI: 0.48-0.55)]. GBS: Glasgow-Blatchford score; BBS: Baylor bleeding score; RS: Rockall score.

Citation: Budimir I, Stojsavljević S, Baršić N, Bišćanin A, Mirošević G, Bohnec S, Kirigin LS, Pavić T, Ljubičić N. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(41): 7450-7458
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i41/7450.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i41.7450