Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2017; 23(37): 6845-6853
Published online Oct 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6845
Published online Oct 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6845
Table 2 Limit of detection test results
Sample Conc. | 1st Batch of reagent | 2nd Batch of reagent | 3rd Batch of reagent | Average detection rate | ||||||
(IU/ml) | NO. | NO. not | Detection | NO. | NO. not | Detection | NO. | NO. not | Detection | |
detected | detected | rate | detected | detected | Rate | detected | detected | rate | ||
2.5 | 10 | 15 | 40% | 12 | 13 | 48% | 11 | 14 | 44% | 44.0% |
5 | 21 | 4 | 84% | 20 | 5 | 80% | 22 | 3 | 88% | 84.0% |
10 | 25 | 0 | 100% | 24 | 1 | 96% | 25 | 0 | 100% | 98.7% |
15 | 25 | 0 | 100% | 25 | 0 | 100% | 25 | 0 | 100% | 100.0% |
30 | 25 | 0 | 100% | 25 | 0 | 100% | 25 | 0 | 100% | 100.0% |
- Citation: Li M, Chen L, Liu LM, Li YL, Li BA, Li B, Mao YL, Xia LF, Wang T, Liu YN, Li Z, Guo TS. Performance verification and comparison of TianLong automatic hypersensitive hepatitis B virus DNA quantification system with Roche CAP/CTM system. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(37): 6845-6853
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i37/6845.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6845